Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Jew Hating 101

Were you aware of the Durban Conference? The following is found here.

NGO Forum at Durban Conference 2001

A UN resolution began the process leading to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance held at Durban in September 2001. Interested non-governmental organizations to be represented by observers, in accordance with UN Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31 were also invited to attend as observers.

A regional conference in Tehran, intended to produce a composite Declaration against Racism and a Plan of Action, preceded the conference. Israel, along with Jewish NGOs, were excluded and, in their absence, Israel was accused of committing holocausts and being anti-Semitic. There was no public condemnation of the exclusion of Israel or the Jewish groups by any of the international NGOs. During the World Conference, large numbers of NGOs organized a parallel NGO Forum (sometimes confused with the Conference) that, in turn, succeeded in overshadowing the formal proceedings. This was due to the large amount of media attention the NGOs were able to generate. The NGO Forum produced what is known as "The NGO Declaration," which, while not an official conference document, assumed a high international profile and was signed by groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

The NGO declaration at the Durban conference, written in highly politicized language, reflected a concerted effort to undermine Israel. Article 164 states targeted victims of Israel's brand of apartheid and ethnic cleansing methods have been in particular children, women and refugees. Article 425 announces a policy of complete and total isolation of Israel as an apartheid state...the imposition of mandatory and comprehensive sanctions and embargoes, the full cessation of all links (diplomatic, economic, social, aid, military cooperation and training) between all states and Israel. Furthermore, Article 426 talks of condemnation of those states who are supporting, aiding and abetting the Israeli apartheid state and its perpetration of racist crimes against humanity including ethnic cleansing, acts of genocide.

The constant comparisons with South Africa and apartheid are fundamentally flawed. Israel grants full legal and civic equality to its Arab minority. The status of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip is subject to a final settlement and the issue of a Palestinian state is a matter of intense diplomatic energy and sensitive negotiation. Moreover, the Israeli army has a clear policy of avoiding civilian casualties. A fact of the war on terror is the concentration of suicide bomb-making factories in densely-populated areas. Moreover, the Palestinians have also shown a willingness to put small children directly in the line of fire. These reasons help explain the tragic number of Palestinian children and women killed. In cases where Israeli soldiers have shown excesses, they have stood trial and were removed from their positions. The NGO Forum omitted to mention any of these facts, and this pattern is seen in the NGO community repeatedly.

Fast forward eight years later to O'gasmic times, and we have a reconvening of this forum to be named, Durban II, where once again, nations come together to discuss racism and the battle to conquer this evil. Witness the following:

The Obama administration's decision to join the planning of the U.N.'s Durban II "anti-racism" conference has just taken a new twist: cover-up. On Friday, State Department officials and a member of the American Durban II delegation claimed the United States had worked actively to oppose efforts to brand Israel as racist in the committee drafting a Durban II declaration. The trouble is that they didn't.

The Feb. 20 State Department press release says the U.S. delegation in Geneva "outline[d] our concerns with the current outcome document" and in particular "our strong reservations about the direction of the conference, as the draft document singles out Israel for criticism." One member of the delegation told The Washington Post: "The administration is pushing back against efforts to brand Israel as racist in this conference." In fact, tucked away in a Geneva hall with few observers, the U.S. had done just the opposite. The U.S. delegates had made no objection to a new proposal to nail Israel in an anti-racism manifesto that makes no other country-specific claims.

This watchdog on the UN alert,if you will, has been following O's decision to avoid the ever growing cancer of antisemitism that has always been present but has skyrocketed into brazen, open forums since Hamas provoked Israel one too many times.

Furthermore, "on Tuesday, the Palestinian delegation proposed inserting a new paragraph under the heading "Identification of further concrete measures and initiatives ... for combating and eliminating all manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance..." with the subtitle "General provisions on victims ... of discrimination." The paragraph includes: "Calls for ... the international protection of the Palestinian people throughout the occupied Palestinian territory." In other words, it claims that the Palestinian people are victims of Israeli racism and demands that all U.N. states provide protection from the affronts of the racist Jewish state."
It is often said that silence is golden, and apparently the Hussein administration is basking in the glow of bullion, for they have remained mum to the above assertions. The unfolding of this little known story continues with:
"Furthermore, the new Palestinian provision "Calls for ... implementation of international legal obligations, including the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the wall..." This is a dramatic attempt to change an "advisory opinion" into a "legal obligation"--a status which attaches to no advisory opinion. The ICJ decision, which advises that the Israeli security fence is illegal, has always been rejected by the United States--hitherto. And with good reason. The Egyptian judge had voiced his opinion on the result before the case was even heard, in his capacity as a leading Egyptian diplomat. The terms of reference from the General Assembly who asked for the decision, and the documents they laid before the Court, predetermined the outcome. And as the strong dissent by the American judge and Holocaust survivor Tom Buergenthal pointed out, the Court came to its preposterous conclusion that "the right of legitimate or inherent self-defense is not applicable in the present case" without considering "the deadly terrorist attacks to which Israel is being subjected."

But when the Palestinian delegation laid their new proposal before the drafting committee, what did Obama's team do? Nothing, absolutely nothing. They made no objection at all."
You can read the rest here.

This conference will take place in April in Geneva, Switzerland, and once again we see the uprising of anti-Jewish sentiment mushrooming since our muslim savior, allah loving, Resident Select has been on the scene. I've lost count of his extensions of love to the arab world since taking up space in the West Wing. AIPAC, frankly, you deserve this. As do seventy six percent of the Jewish population of the U.S. who voted for him because Jews are cool and our guilt is what defines us most especially when we have nothing to feel guilty about.

Excerpts were also extrapolated from Forbes.com in an article dated, 2.22.09, where
Anne Bayefsky outlines with great detail, Hussein's approval of anti-Jewish sentiment.

It's not very popular to generalize and denigrate an entire religion, but I gotta call a spade a spade. Muslims are the scourge of our society, and if there are some who were raised without the indoctrination of Jew hating, they would probably side with their radical brethren when faced with a decision. To anyone who is offended by this, tough. Welcome my fellow Jews to our new world, aka, The Fourth Reich.

Oh yeah, the picture of the flag on the top of this post...curious?

UN Wipes Israel Off the Map - Photos - November 29, 2005 UN Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People

This is the prominent UN public display which was used to mark the commemoration of "International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People" on November 29, 2005. The Palestinian flag is on one side. The UN flag is on the other side. A map without the UN member state of Israel stands between them.

Some things never change.


Shtuey said...

And where is Secretary Clinton's voice in all of this? I have said at OMV that I could see her leaving her post over Israel. Her silence on this is really pissing me the fuck off.

petunia politik said...

I've been quiet on this blog with regard to Hill's apparent sell-out, but more vocal in other venues. I'd bet my last dollar (soon to be true) that she is not going to oppose this or any anti-Israeli Hussein stance. We've been duped. Every politician for themselves. Personally, I'd like my money back from her "war chest." I'd be happy to spread it amongst all of us.

petunia politik said...

I've been quiet on this blog with regard to Hill's apparent sell-out, but more vocal in other venues. I'd bet my last dollar (soon to be true) that she is not going to oppose this or any anti-Israeli Hussein stance. We've been duped. Every politician for themselves. Personally, I'd like my money back from her "war chest." I'd be happy to spread it amongst all of us.